Boarding Your Next Flight? You Might Be Playing Boeing's Deadliest Lottery
Nyenta.com/10321762

NEW YORK - Nyenta -- NOTE TO MEDIA & READER

IMPORTANT NOTE TO READERS AND MEDIA

We use PRLog to publish our truth and documented assessment based on 40 years in quality assurance—including 14 years running my own business. We possess all corroborating data, paperwork, letters, and evidence that mainstream media outlets like Politico, Bloomberg, Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and other news outlets, refuse to share. These organizations do not want the public to know about the failures of federal agencies and corporations charged with oversight. Contact: Daryl Guberman's 203-556-1493

From 2002 through 2024, Boeing and its certification network operated under a structure that removed true independent on-site inspections from thousands of commercial aircraft deliveries.

Over this 22-year period-264 months & 8,036 days — 8,000 to 12,000 aircraft — the flying public has been left in the dark about whether these planes were ever inspected by Boeing supplier/source inspection.

The shift began quietly.

April 2002: Boeing issued 2 supplier bulletins, 7-months after 9/11, announcing a major shift in quality oversight.Boeing issued a supplier bulletin mandating that all suppliers performing special processes — including heat treating, welding, and non-destructive testing (CRITICAL-FLIGHT SAFETY)— must hold NADCAP (National Aerospace and Defense Contractors Accreditation Program) certification. The cost and complexity of obtaining NADCAP pushed out smaller suppliers, while shifting control to a centralized certification authority.

July 2002: The bulletin stated that  suppliers must be AS 9100 and certified by ANSI-ANAB. Both April & July notifications: Suppliers were to send in their certifications and ship their parts, and that Boeing would only send a team to visit a facility "if need be, or need arises." This same bulletin explicitly announced the reduction in redundant inspection — and in many cases elimination — of Supplier or Source Inspection, Boeing's traditional in-person supplier quality audit program.

More on Nyenta.com

• T. Jones Group's Cameron Jones Serves as Judge for the 2026 CHBA National Awards for Housing Excellence
• L'Atelier Paris Introduces Le Linéaire During NYCxDESIGN 2026
• NYC Buyers Are Relocating To Westchester At Accelerating Pace In 2026, Says Local Realtor
• The AI Direction Deficit: TripleTen Study Finds Staff Get Told to Use AI — But Not Trained to Use It
• VConnect USA LLC Launches Dedicated B2B and B2C Commerce Platforms

Then came October 2003's "Heads Up 22" — a document virtually unknown in the quality assurance community — announcing requirements tied to the Online Aerospace Supplier Information System (OASIS). This policy change effectively centralized oversight within a small, interconnected circle of industry players, closing the door on many independent inspections.

By stepping away from direct on-site inspections, Boeing effectively replaced physical, independent verification with a paper and portal-based system — one that insiders knew could be shaped from the inside.

The Public Safety Gap:

• 22 years without guaranteed independent physical inspection of delivered aircraft.
• 8,000–12,000 airplanes in service under this system.
• Boeing's oversight delegated to entities within its own orbit.
 

~NOTICE TO PASSENGERS~

We realize you want to get from point A to point B without worrying if the plane will fall out of the sky. Most people do not care about aircraft quality until there is a crash and their loved ones are crying. I am speaking to you as a quality professional with 40+ years of experience, a Boeing shareholder, and someone who has spent nearly a month on-site at Boeing's Renton, Auburn, Everett and Northfield facilities—talking with employee's morning, afternoon, and evening.

The aviation community has never been given the full story, but the paper trail exists — and I have it all. This is why mainstream media refuses to interview me, whether it is on 60 Minutes, print publications, magazines, or radio or other outlets. Essentially, with Boeing's quality issues from 2002 to 2024, between 8,000 to12,000 aircraft are flying around, and you're playing a "fly or die" lottery.

A piece of paper does not guarantee that a part was built under strict, proper conditions — but to Boeing, that was deemed acceptable. While Boeing's suppliers were hijacked by registration companies accredited by ANSI–ANAB or their international equivalents and required to be AS9100 certified, Boeing itself was not AS9100 certified for 22 years-264 months & 8,036 days.

In 2009, the FAA gave Boeing the authority to act as its own certifying agency, effectively allowing Boeing to self-certify aircraft, aircraft technologies like (MCAS system that was implicated in the death of 340+ passengers on the Ethiopian and Indonesian airlines 2018-2019), and designs.

More on Nyenta.com

• Renisis Wins National Jewelry Competition
• Monticello Equipment Named Authorized Forklift Dealer for LiuGong North America
• $29.8 Million Record Setting Q1 with Boosted Annual Guidance to $160 Million for Expanding Pre-Owned Boat Dealer: Off The Hook YS, Inc. N Y S E: OTH
• All About Technology Celebrates 25 Years of Bridging Detroit's Digital Divide
• iatroX surpasses 500,000 clinical queries and expands specialist exam coverage

I'm telling you: you must take extreme caution with Boeing aircraft. Until you hear from me, Daryl Guberman, that Boeing's quality program is rock solid, do not fly Boeing — get on an Airbus instead. I know most won't care, and maybe you shouldn't — but when your family is crying over your body, your family will wish you had listened to me. At that point, you will call upon me.

Evidence Exists — But It's Not Public

The full set of documents, including original Boeing supplier bulletins, accreditation committee records, and rare internal notices, are available for review by serious investigators, media, and regulators.

Many documents have been removed by Boeing and their accreditation body ANSI-ANAB," are virtually impossible to find in public archives — yet they define how Boeing's certification system was reshaped. We have ALL the documentation which were removed after my appearance on April 17,2024 DHS Subcommittee  https://www.newstribune.com/ photos/2024/ apr/18/3749044/

Articles for Reference:

22 Years Of Fraud: AS9100 Suppliers BETRAYED By Boeing And ANSI-ANAB — A Call For A Class Action Lawsuit https://www.prlog.org/13080085-22-years-of-fraud-as9100-suppliers-betrayed-by-boeing-and-ansi-anab-call-for-class-action-lawsuit.htm l

The Largest Industrial Scam Ever Perpetrated Worldwide Started With Boeing https://www.prlog.org/13092416-the-largest-industrial-scam-ever-perpetrated-worldwide-started-with-boeing.html#

Before You Fly: QA Expert & Boeing Shareholder DARYL GUBERMAN Exposes Hidden Dangers The Public (Business Owners), FAA, and DOJ Turn a Blind Eye to Boeing's Fake Quality & Safety Certifications—Now We Know Why https://www.prlog.org/13088849-before-you-fly-qa-expert-boeing-shareholder-daryl-guberman-exposes-hidden-dangers.html#

The Certification Conspiracy: How Boeing Faked Aerospace Quality for 20 Years and Forced Everyone Else to Pay for It https://www.prlog.org/13079809-the-certification-conspiracy-how-boeing-faked-aerospace-quality-for-20-years-and-forced-everyone-else-to-pay-for-it.html