Trending...
- Kevin "Mr. Wonderful" O'Leary Begins New Universal Coin & Bullion Promotion of Gold and Silver
- The Simplest Small Business You're Probably Not Thinking About
- Padel Tournament in Brooklyn to Support Bone Marrow Transplant Patients
Will Nevada's Highest Court Confront Corruption—Or Allow It to Continue?
LAS VEGAS - Nyenta -- Source: The Verity Project
Karina Singer, a pro se appellant and daughter of the late Steven J. Singer, is awaiting a critical ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court after filing extensive, unrebutted evidence of fiduciary misconduct, elder financial abuse, and judicial irregularities in her father's trust and estate case.
The appeal—Case No. 89171—was originally retained by the Supreme Court for over eight months before being suddenly transferred to the Nevada Court of Appeals just days after Singer formally requested summary disposition, citing NRAP 31(d), and presenting direct evidence of court record tampering, elder exploitation, and constitutional due process violations.
Despite following every procedural rule available to self-represented litigants—including the Court's own Informal Brief Form, which lacks a section for a routing statement—the transfer was carried out without addressing any of the pending dispositive motions or the substantial evidence submitted into the record, some of which includes:
Singer has since filed an Emergency Motion to Recall Transfer and Retain Jurisdiction, along with a Supplement and Renewed Request for Summary Disposition or Evidentiary Hearing, refuting every baseless argument in the Respondents' opposition. All motions are currently before a panel of three Supreme Court Justices, Patricia Lee, Linda Bell, and Douglas Herndon.
More on Nyenta.com
"The law is not in question. The facts are not in dispute," said Singer. "If the Nevada Supreme Court fails to apply the law and address the uncontested evidence already in the record, it exposes both the Court and the State of Nevada to federal intervention, civil rights litigation, and a potential RICO action for coordinated misconduct involving trustees, attorneys, and judicial officers. This is no longer just about my father; it's about a systemic breakdown that cannot be ignored."
The Court has everything it needs to act. The real question is: Will the Nevada Supreme Court stand for truth and justice under controlling law and binding precedent; or sacrifice its legitimacy, trigger federal scrutiny, and lose the trust of the people it was created to protect?
Singer's filings argue that the transfer violated the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure and, if not reversed, would leave constitutional violations unaddressed and incentivize further abuse within Nevada's probate and guardianship courts. She asserts that the Supreme Court has a mandatory, non-waivable obligation under NRAP 17(a)(9)–(11) to retain jurisdiction over appeals involving judicial misconduct, systemic due process failures, issues of first impression, and matters of statewide public concern. Singer requests that the Court recall the transfer, retain jurisdiction, and summarily rule in her favor under NRAP 31(d), citing the complete absence of an answering brief and any disputed facts in the record. She further urges the Court to grant en banc review, hold responsible parties accountable, and issue a published decision that restores public trust by acknowledging and correcting the serious legal errors committed in the lower court.
More on Nyenta.com
As Nevada watches, the decision in The Matter of Steven J. Singer Trust & Estate - Singer v. Boekankamp could set a precedent for how the state's highest court handles self-represented litigants, judicial accountability, and the integrity of trust and estate proceedings.
Karina Singer, a pro se appellant and daughter of the late Steven J. Singer, is awaiting a critical ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court after filing extensive, unrebutted evidence of fiduciary misconduct, elder financial abuse, and judicial irregularities in her father's trust and estate case.
The appeal—Case No. 89171—was originally retained by the Supreme Court for over eight months before being suddenly transferred to the Nevada Court of Appeals just days after Singer formally requested summary disposition, citing NRAP 31(d), and presenting direct evidence of court record tampering, elder exploitation, and constitutional due process violations.
Despite following every procedural rule available to self-represented litigants—including the Court's own Informal Brief Form, which lacks a section for a routing statement—the transfer was carried out without addressing any of the pending dispositive motions or the substantial evidence submitted into the record, some of which includes:
- Forged financial account documents and unopposed motions for trustee removal, accounting, criminal fraud, and elder abuse.
- Allegations of perjury and false police reports by opposing parties,
- Tampering with electronic court service systems and docket manipulation,
- Improper distribution of over $1 million in trust assets in direct violation of the trust's provisions.
Singer has since filed an Emergency Motion to Recall Transfer and Retain Jurisdiction, along with a Supplement and Renewed Request for Summary Disposition or Evidentiary Hearing, refuting every baseless argument in the Respondents' opposition. All motions are currently before a panel of three Supreme Court Justices, Patricia Lee, Linda Bell, and Douglas Herndon.
More on Nyenta.com
- T. Jones Group's Cameron Jones Serves as Judge for the 2026 CHBA National Awards for Housing Excellence
- L'Atelier Paris Introduces Le Linéaire During NYCxDESIGN 2026
- NYC Buyers Are Relocating To Westchester At Accelerating Pace In 2026, Says Local Realtor
- The AI Direction Deficit: TripleTen Study Finds Staff Get Told to Use AI — But Not Trained to Use It
- VConnect USA LLC Launches Dedicated B2B and B2C Commerce Platforms
"The law is not in question. The facts are not in dispute," said Singer. "If the Nevada Supreme Court fails to apply the law and address the uncontested evidence already in the record, it exposes both the Court and the State of Nevada to federal intervention, civil rights litigation, and a potential RICO action for coordinated misconduct involving trustees, attorneys, and judicial officers. This is no longer just about my father; it's about a systemic breakdown that cannot be ignored."
The Court has everything it needs to act. The real question is: Will the Nevada Supreme Court stand for truth and justice under controlling law and binding precedent; or sacrifice its legitimacy, trigger federal scrutiny, and lose the trust of the people it was created to protect?
Singer's filings argue that the transfer violated the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure and, if not reversed, would leave constitutional violations unaddressed and incentivize further abuse within Nevada's probate and guardianship courts. She asserts that the Supreme Court has a mandatory, non-waivable obligation under NRAP 17(a)(9)–(11) to retain jurisdiction over appeals involving judicial misconduct, systemic due process failures, issues of first impression, and matters of statewide public concern. Singer requests that the Court recall the transfer, retain jurisdiction, and summarily rule in her favor under NRAP 31(d), citing the complete absence of an answering brief and any disputed facts in the record. She further urges the Court to grant en banc review, hold responsible parties accountable, and issue a published decision that restores public trust by acknowledging and correcting the serious legal errors committed in the lower court.
More on Nyenta.com
- Renisis Wins National Jewelry Competition
- Monticello Equipment Named Authorized Forklift Dealer for LiuGong North America
- $29.8 Million Record Setting Q1 with Boosted Annual Guidance to $160 Million for Expanding Pre-Owned Boat Dealer: Off The Hook YS, Inc. N Y S E: OTH
- All About Technology Celebrates 25 Years of Bridging Detroit's Digital Divide
- iatroX surpasses 500,000 clinical queries and expands specialist exam coverage
As Nevada watches, the decision in The Matter of Steven J. Singer Trust & Estate - Singer v. Boekankamp could set a precedent for how the state's highest court handles self-represented litigants, judicial accountability, and the integrity of trust and estate proceedings.
Source: The Verity Project
0 Comments
Latest on Nyenta.com
- N Y S E: OTH Off The Hook YS Is Building a Vertically Integrated Marine Empire — And Investors Are Starting to Notice
- Concierge Title Agency Merges with Independence Title, Inc. to Deliver an Expanded Concierge Closing Experience Across South Florida
- New Data: Female Athletes Now Dominate Sports Brand Deals as OpenSponsorship Releases 2026 Marketing Report
- Grow My Security Company Launches Next-Generation Website and Expands Strategic Marketing Solutions for the Security Industry
- $4.8M in Contracted AI Revenue with Projections of $30M Over 6-12 Months for Diversified AI Software and Platform-Based Services Provider XMax Inc
- Michelangelo's Great Secret Hiding in Plain Sight
- Virginia Marchese's Paradox: A Nation Still Deciding Who Belongs Examines Race, Migration, Law, and America's Unfinished Struggle for Equality
- From Blank Page to Published Book
- Larry R. Wasion's Jump Gate III RoadMaker Blends Cutting-Edge Sci-Fi with High-Stakes Space Exploration and Complex Technologies
- Tabpro Solutions Named to Two Forbes 2026 Best Recruiting Firms Lists
- Boom•Clap Expands Affordable Access for Independent Creatives and Grassroots Organizations
- American Mensa and Davidson Institute Join Forces To Strengthen Support for Profoundly Gifted Youth
- 16th Annual Art Of Brooklyn Film Fest Returns June 1-10 with 55 New Indies
- 360 Sound And Vision Releases The Ubiquitous Compact Disc and America's Most Deadly UFO Encounters
- SpeedyIndex Rolls Out Automated API for Mass URL Verification, Solving the Backlink Blind Spot for SEO Agencies
- KLEKT Announces Appointment of Jay Kimpton to Board of Directors
- Michigan Attorney General Closed FGM Licensing Investigations Months Before Federal Case Ended, Records Show
- Mensa Foundation Event Reframes Brain Health for Every Age
- DLT Resolution, Inc. (Stock Symbol: DLTI) Expands Into the $224 Billion Life Settlements Market While Accelerating Telecom Growth Across Canada
- onSpark Launches an AI-Driven Operating System for the $200B Partnership Economy
