Trending...
- Mister America Competition 2026, Open call Nationwide for all Young Man from 18-28 - 146
- To-Do List and Task Reminder Simple Android App for Everyday Organization
- The Simplest Small Business You're Probably Not Thinking About
Aerospace And Medical Device Safety Placed At Risk As Federal Agencies Relied On An Accreditation Body Later Shown To Have Falsified Its Standing On U.S. Department Of State Contract No. 19AQMM18R0131. (This Issue Is Worldwide) .
NEW YORK - Nyenta -- Introduction: A Broken Chain of Trust (2018–2026)
From 2018 through 2026, the American National Accreditation Board (ANAB) operated under a falsified representation on U.S. Department of State Contract No. 19AQMM18R0131, claiming to be an "underwriter" for the International Accreditation Forum (IAF). This misrepresentation—publicly echoed by private entities such as Rohloff and African Fuse—fractured the continuity of certification across aerospace, medical‑device, plastics, metals, and machine‑shop suppliers. As of this press release 3/25/2026 African Fuse – Is still live with ANAB being and underwriter for IAF & ILAC. https://www.crown.co.za/images/LatestNews/AfricanFusion/H_Rohloff_NDT.pdf
Both the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sit on the boards of ANSI-ANAB. The FDA is not only a board member but also a paying customer. These agencies wrote the very standards that prohibit falsification, and those standards were violated at the root of the certification chain.
Aerospace Impact: Continuity Lost Across OEMs- "Original Equipment Manufacturers" and Suppliers
The aerospace sector depends on continuity of certification. Whether a supplier holds AS9100 or ISO 9001, the system is designed so that Joe's AS9100 shop and Jim's ISO 9001 shop maintain equivalent, traceable quality. That continuity collapsed the moment ANAB's misrepresentation under Contract No. 19AQMM18R0131 entered the chain.
This affects:
Boeing has operated without AS9100 certification since July 2002, despite implying compliance through its supplier portal. Boeing relied on FAA airworthiness certificates as a substitute for third‑party oversight—yet airworthiness has never superseded AS9100, and cannot.
AS9100 requires independent, third‑party auditing, which Boeing did not have.
Boeing's Position on ANAB's Management Systems Accreditation Committee (2014–2024)
From 2014 through 2024, Boeing held a seat on ANAB's Management Systems Accreditation Committee (MSAC) — the governing body with the authority to:
Yet in 2018, when ANAB falsely represented itself as an "underwriter" on Contract No. 19AQMM18R0131, Boeing continued to push ANAB‑accredited certification onto its suppliers through its supplier portal.
More on Nyenta.com
-ACTUAL BOEING LINK & QUOTE FROM THEIR WEBSITE -
Quality Requirements & Information
https://www.boeingsuppliers.com/become/quality/faq#accordion-a26ad9a916-item-8202308774
Boeing Quality Management System Requirements for Suppliers Frequently Asked Questions
Will Third Party Approvals Be Recognize By Boeing?
Certified quality management systems to AS 9100, AS 9110 and AS 9120 may be utilized by Boeing for approval if:
As of 3/25/2026 Boeings Supplier Portal, still states that third‑party registrars must be ANAB‑accredited, despite:
Addendum: Boeing's Position Made Ignorance Impossible
Given Boeing's decade‑long presence on ANAB's Management Systems Accreditation Committee (MSAC), its continued enforcement of ANAB‑accredited registrars in its supplier portal, and its reliance on certification structures directly affected by ANAB's misrepresentation under Contract No. 19AQMM18R0131, it is difficult to reconcile the idea that Boeing was unaware of the accreditation breakdown. The information was available, structural, and unavoidable to anyone in Boeing's position. Whether through direct knowledge or willful blindness, Boeing occupied a role where they either knew, or they should have known, that the certification environment supporting their global supply chain had been compromised.
Medical‑Device Impact: Implants, Valves, and Life‑Critical Devices at Risk
The same broken accreditation chain affects medical‑device manufacturers operating under ISO 13485. This includes:
THE FDA WROTE THE RULES—and they cannot exempt themselves from them.
The Core Issue: They Wrote the Rules They Violated!
More on Nyenta.com
The FAA and FDA sit on ANSI/ANAB's board.
The FDA is also a paying customer.
These agencies authored the very standards that prohibit falsification, misrepresentation, and fraudulent documentation.
From 2018–2026, those standards were violated at the top of the certification chain—by the accreditation body itself ANSI-ANAB, under Contract No. 19AQMM18R0131.
There is no waiver, no exception, and no administrative workaround that can erase the consequences of falsified accreditation.
Applicable FAA and FDA Standards
FAA Standards
Addendum: Airworthiness and Medical Devices from 2018–2026
From 2018-2026, any aircraft—including airplanes, helicopters,—manufactured under the compromised accreditation system cannot rely on an FAA waiver to ensure airworthiness. No waiver can override a falsified foundation. The same applies to hardware, avionics systems, and critical components built during this period. When the certification base is fraudulent, every downstream approval becomes suspect.
Likewise, individuals who received medical devices such as hip implants, knee replacements, or heart valves during this timeframe may now have legal grounds to question the integrity of the certification environment behind their devices. These products were manufactured within a system whose accreditation chain was compromised at the top, under Contract No. 19AQMM18R0131.
This is not limited to aerospace and medical devices. The same broken chain touches automotive, electronics, plastics, metals, and global manufacturing sectors that relied on ANAB's misrepresented status. This is not an American problem — it is a global systemic failure.
Closing Statement
When the system that certifies safety becomes unsafe, every product it touches becomes suspect.
From aircraft to implants, from fuselages to heart valves, the years 2018–2026 represent a period where the public was asked to trust a chain of certification built on a false foundation.
This is the largest industrial fiduciary fraud ever perpetrated on humanity.
And yet, the path forward is clear: the FAA and FDA can only rebuild by following the lead of quality expert and Boeing shareholder Daryl Guberman, whose work unmasked a fraudulent system affecting aerospace, medical, automotive, electronics, and global manufacturing. The future of safety regulation now depends on embracing the same dedication to truth that exposed this failure.
"In a world built on trust, only truth can restore the foundation.Let this be the moment we choose integrity over illusion,for a future worthy of the lives it protects."
— D. Guberman, 2026
"People don't reject the truth because it's wrong. They reject it because it demands change."
- ANONYMOUS
From 2018 through 2026, the American National Accreditation Board (ANAB) operated under a falsified representation on U.S. Department of State Contract No. 19AQMM18R0131, claiming to be an "underwriter" for the International Accreditation Forum (IAF). This misrepresentation—publicly echoed by private entities such as Rohloff and African Fuse—fractured the continuity of certification across aerospace, medical‑device, plastics, metals, and machine‑shop suppliers. As of this press release 3/25/2026 African Fuse – Is still live with ANAB being and underwriter for IAF & ILAC. https://www.crown.co.za/images/LatestNews/AfricanFusion/H_Rohloff_NDT.pdf
Both the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sit on the boards of ANSI-ANAB. The FDA is not only a board member but also a paying customer. These agencies wrote the very standards that prohibit falsification, and those standards were violated at the root of the certification chain.
Aerospace Impact: Continuity Lost Across OEMs- "Original Equipment Manufacturers" and Suppliers
The aerospace sector depends on continuity of certification. Whether a supplier holds AS9100 or ISO 9001, the system is designed so that Joe's AS9100 shop and Jim's ISO 9001 shop maintain equivalent, traceable quality. That continuity collapsed the moment ANAB's misrepresentation under Contract No. 19AQMM18R0131 entered the chain.
This affects:
- Boeing
- Lockheed Martin
- Northrop Grumman
- Raytheon
- General Dynamics
- Tier‑1, Tier‑2, and Tier‑3 suppliers
- Plastics, metals, heat‑treaters, fastener manufacturers
- Small machine shops who had no knowledge of the falsified accreditation
Boeing has operated without AS9100 certification since July 2002, despite implying compliance through its supplier portal. Boeing relied on FAA airworthiness certificates as a substitute for third‑party oversight—yet airworthiness has never superseded AS9100, and cannot.
AS9100 requires independent, third‑party auditing, which Boeing did not have.
Boeing's Position on ANAB's Management Systems Accreditation Committee (2014–2024)
From 2014 through 2024, Boeing held a seat on ANAB's Management Systems Accreditation Committee (MSAC) — the governing body with the authority to:
- grant certifications
- suspend certifications
- withdraw certifications
Yet in 2018, when ANAB falsely represented itself as an "underwriter" on Contract No. 19AQMM18R0131, Boeing continued to push ANAB‑accredited certification onto its suppliers through its supplier portal.
More on Nyenta.com
- Robert J. Bradshaw's AYE is a Gripping Dual Reality Thriller Exploring the Increasingly Blurred Line Between Humanity and Technology
- Bangxing Silicone Revolutionizes Silicone Baby Product Partnerships: Low MOQ Support + VIP Long-Term Win-Win Programs
- Wnode - The First Granny‑Proof DePIN Compute Mesh, Turns Idle Hardware Into a People‑Owned
- SteelTree Announces Launch of Its Operational Decision Intelligence Service
- Advanced AI Capabilities Reflected by Upcoming Company Name and Stock Symbol Change for Evolving Pre-Owned Boat Dealer: Off The Hook YS: N Y S E: OTH
-ACTUAL BOEING LINK & QUOTE FROM THEIR WEBSITE -
Quality Requirements & Information
https://www.boeingsuppliers.com/become/quality/faq#accordion-a26ad9a916-item-8202308774
Boeing Quality Management System Requirements for Suppliers Frequently Asked Questions
Will Third Party Approvals Be Recognize By Boeing?
Certified quality management systems to AS 9100, AS 9110 and AS 9120 may be utilized by Boeing for approval if:
- Certification Body is accredited for these quality management system by the ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board (ANAB) or international equivalent; and
- Certificate of registration is to SAE AS 9104 and certified supplier is listed in the IAQG OASIS database and in good standing.
As of 3/25/2026 Boeings Supplier Portal, still states that third‑party registrars must be ANAB‑accredited, despite:
- Boeing knowing ANAB's misrepresentation began in 2018
- Boeing sitting on the committee responsible for accreditation oversight
- Boeing having no AS9100 certification themselves
- Boeing relying on airworthiness certificates that cannot override fraudulent documentation
Addendum: Boeing's Position Made Ignorance Impossible
Given Boeing's decade‑long presence on ANAB's Management Systems Accreditation Committee (MSAC), its continued enforcement of ANAB‑accredited registrars in its supplier portal, and its reliance on certification structures directly affected by ANAB's misrepresentation under Contract No. 19AQMM18R0131, it is difficult to reconcile the idea that Boeing was unaware of the accreditation breakdown. The information was available, structural, and unavoidable to anyone in Boeing's position. Whether through direct knowledge or willful blindness, Boeing occupied a role where they either knew, or they should have known, that the certification environment supporting their global supply chain had been compromised.
Medical‑Device Impact: Implants, Valves, and Life‑Critical Devices at Risk
The same broken accreditation chain affects medical‑device manufacturers operating under ISO 13485. This includes:
- heart valves
- hip implants
- knee implants
- surgical instruments
- implantable devices
- life‑support components
- process validation
- device history records
- conformity assessments
- sterilization controls
- traceability
THE FDA WROTE THE RULES—and they cannot exempt themselves from them.
The Core Issue: They Wrote the Rules They Violated!
More on Nyenta.com
- AI-Driven Defense Expansion, Autonomous Systems and Israeli Aerospace Manufacturing Platform: VisionWave Holdings (N A S D A Q: VWAV)
- AI Predicts the Most Likely 2026 FIFA World Cup Winner
- "Jim Peters At Night" Cracks Top One Percent of TikTok Views
- The AI Production Shift: Why Game Development Is Entering Its Most Accelerated Phase
- World-First AI Humanoid Robot Debuts on Cherie Barber's Ground-breaking Australian Reno Show
The FAA and FDA sit on ANSI/ANAB's board.
The FDA is also a paying customer.
These agencies authored the very standards that prohibit falsification, misrepresentation, and fraudulent documentation.
From 2018–2026, those standards were violated at the top of the certification chain—by the accreditation body itself ANSI-ANAB, under Contract No. 19AQMM18R0131.
There is no waiver, no exception, and no administrative workaround that can erase the consequences of falsified accreditation.
Applicable FAA and FDA Standards
FAA Standards
- 14 CFR Part 3 (Subpart D) — Prohibits fraudulent or intentionally false statements, omissions, and falsified records.
- 14 CFR §21.2 — Any falsified document invalidates production and airworthiness approvals.
- 14 CFR §121.9 — Prohibits fraud, falsification, and altered records used to show compliance.
- 21 CFR §820.180— Requires complete, accurate, truthful, and unaltered manufacturing and quality records.
- 21 CFR §820.70 — Requires validated processes and controlled environments; fraudulent accreditation invalidates process validation.
- 21 CFR §803.50 — Requires reporting of any condition that could cause serious injury or death, including fraudulent certification environments.
Addendum: Airworthiness and Medical Devices from 2018–2026
From 2018-2026, any aircraft—including airplanes, helicopters,—manufactured under the compromised accreditation system cannot rely on an FAA waiver to ensure airworthiness. No waiver can override a falsified foundation. The same applies to hardware, avionics systems, and critical components built during this period. When the certification base is fraudulent, every downstream approval becomes suspect.
Likewise, individuals who received medical devices such as hip implants, knee replacements, or heart valves during this timeframe may now have legal grounds to question the integrity of the certification environment behind their devices. These products were manufactured within a system whose accreditation chain was compromised at the top, under Contract No. 19AQMM18R0131.
This is not limited to aerospace and medical devices. The same broken chain touches automotive, electronics, plastics, metals, and global manufacturing sectors that relied on ANAB's misrepresented status. This is not an American problem — it is a global systemic failure.
Closing Statement
When the system that certifies safety becomes unsafe, every product it touches becomes suspect.
From aircraft to implants, from fuselages to heart valves, the years 2018–2026 represent a period where the public was asked to trust a chain of certification built on a false foundation.
This is the largest industrial fiduciary fraud ever perpetrated on humanity.
And yet, the path forward is clear: the FAA and FDA can only rebuild by following the lead of quality expert and Boeing shareholder Daryl Guberman, whose work unmasked a fraudulent system affecting aerospace, medical, automotive, electronics, and global manufacturing. The future of safety regulation now depends on embracing the same dedication to truth that exposed this failure.
"In a world built on trust, only truth can restore the foundation.Let this be the moment we choose integrity over illusion,for a future worthy of the lives it protects."
— D. Guberman, 2026
"People don't reject the truth because it's wrong. They reject it because it demands change."
- ANONYMOUS
Source: GUBERMAN-PMC,LLC
0 Comments
Latest on Nyenta.com
- Driving Efficiency and Growth: Finger Lakes Federal Credit Union Goes Live with Scienaptic AI
- Fyt-02 Launches on Kickstarter The Smart Sensor That Turns Any Chair Into a Posture & Movement Track
- AI Property Management: How AI in Property Management Is Improving Housing Operations
- Mister America Competition 2026, Open call Nationwide for all Young Man from 18-28
- YieldOMega Launches $DOUB Airdrop Campaign Ahead of TimeCurve Launch
- Former Niagara Falls City Government Department Head Cliff Scott Launches QB Pocket Coach AI
- Kaltra Expands Microchannel Water Coil Line for U.S. HVAC Market With New Corrosion-Resistant Tube Technology
- Collectibles EvoRelic Celebrates Stellar 4.8-Star Customer Rating
- Phoenix Hip-hop Artist Rhymi Hits 23k Monthly Listeners 12 Days After Album Release
- Pediatrician Launches "Confessions of a Detective Doctor" Children's Book Series
- Mrs. Green's CANNAry Launches $2,500 Annual Scholarship for Genesee County Women in Cannabis
- Integrated Maintenance Platforms Are Transforming Aircraft Operations
- T. Jones Group's Cameron Jones Serves as Judge for the 2026 CHBA National Awards for Housing Excellence
- L'Atelier Paris Introduces Le Linéaire During NYCxDESIGN 2026
- Derek Advanced Tracking Systems Revolutionizes Asset Monitoring with Advanced Technology
- NYC Buyers Are Relocating To Westchester At Accelerating Pace In 2026, Says Local Realtor
- The AI Direction Deficit: TripleTen Study Finds Staff Get Told to Use AI — But Not Trained to Use It
- VConnect USA LLC Launches Dedicated B2B and B2C Commerce Platforms
- Renisis Wins National Jewelry Competition
- Monticello Equipment Named Authorized Forklift Dealer for LiuGong North America
